Hyperset Sports Intelligence · Live proof of concept

Tracking the Baltimore–New Zealand rugby audience relationship over time

This page is a working proof of concept for how New Zealand Rugby and the Baltimore Ravens could publish live audience intelligence powered by Hyperset. It combines current search-demand data, geographic interest, team-share analysis and a rolling weekly pulse to show what the Baltimore–New Zealand crossover looks like in measurable audience behaviour.

Proof of concept for New Zealand Rugby Updated 6 October 2026 Data: DataForSEO + Google Search Console + official sources
The proposition

A shared story already exists. The missing layer is independent audience evidence.

New Zealand Rugby and the Baltimore Ravens no longer need an invented reason to appear in the same story. The All Blacks played South Africa at the Ravens’ home stadium on 12 September 2026. Ravens Vice President of Health and Performance Dr Nic Gill arrived in Baltimore after nearly two decades with the All Blacks. NZR has since published multiple pieces explicitly comparing rugby and the NFL and featuring the Ravens environment.

That creates a stronger editorial question: did the sporting connection create measurable audience crossover? Hyperset’s role is to answer that without either organisation having to make the claim itself.

The connection is real

From one-off fixture to an ongoing Baltimore–New Zealand sports corridor

22 Jan 2026
Ravens announce Baltimore as host. M&T Bank Stadium was confirmed for the fourth All Blacks–Springboks Test, bringing the rivalry to the United States. Ravens source ↗
2 Mar 2026
Nic Gill joins the Ravens. Baltimore appointed the former All Blacks health-and-performance leader as Vice President of Health and Performance. Ravens source ↗
9 Sep 2026
NZR publishes “Could an All Black Cut It in the NFL?” Gill is used as the bridge between the two codes immediately before the Baltimore Test. All Blacks source ↗
12 Sep 2026
All Blacks v Springboks at M&T Bank Stadium. The fixture places one of rugby’s biggest rivalries directly inside the Ravens’ home market.
6 Oct 2026
NZR publishes a Ravens crossover feature. Dan Carter, Portia Woodman-Wickliffe and Lima Sopoaga train with the Ravens in a piece built around the differences between rugby and the NFL. All Blacks source ↗
US audience geography

Maryland is one of the strongest US markets for All Blacks search interest

DataForSEO’s 12-month state-level Google Trends index places Maryland at 75 on a scale where the highest-indexing state is 100. That makes Maryland the third-highest indexed state in the current dataset, behind Alaska (100) and Hawaii (97), and ahead of Washington (72) and West Virginia (71).

Alabama — index 41 · US rank #14Alaska — index 100 · US rank #1Arizona — index 15 · US rank #42Colorado — index 27 · US rank #30Florida — index 31 · US rank #24Georgia — index 24 · US rank #34Indiana — index 16 · US rank #41Kansas — index 53 · US rank #9Maine — index 54 · US rank #8Massachusetts — index 32 · US rank #21Minnesota — index 39 · US rank #17New Jersey — index 37 · US rank #19North Carolina — index 30 · US rank #25North Dakota — index 0 · US rank #44Oklahoma — index 39 · US rank #17Pennsylvania — index 26 · US rank #33South Dakota — index 0 · US rank #44Texas — index 30 · US rank #25Wyoming — index 0 · US rank #44Connecticut — index 32 · US rank #21Missouri — index 30 · US rank #25West Virginia — index 71 · US rank #5Illinois — index 37 · US rank #19New Mexico — index 52 · US rank #10Arkansas — index 41 · US rank #14California — index 27 · US rank #30Delaware — index 0 · US rank #44Hawaii — index 97 · US rank #2Iowa — index 20 · US rank #38Kentucky — index 22 · US rank #36Maryland — index 75 · US rank #3Michigan — index 20 · US rank #38Mississippi — index 42 · US rank #12Montana — index 0 · US rank #44New Hampshire — index 29 · US rank #28New York — index 45 · US rank #11Ohio — index 40 · US rank #16Oregon — index 29 · US rank #28Tennessee — index 13 · US rank #43Utah — index 57 · US rank #7Virginia — index 42 · US rank #12Washington — index 72 · US rank #4Wisconsin — index 23 · US rank #35Nebraska — index 17 · US rank #40South Carolina — index 27 · US rank #30Idaho — index 65 · US rank #6Nevada — index 22 · US rank #36Vermont — index 0 · US rank #44Louisiana — index 32 · US rank #21Rhode Island — index 0 · US rank #44
Lower interest100 = highest
How to read this map: this is a relative-interest index, not each state’s percentage of total US searches. A score of 100 identifies the state where All Blacks searches make up the highest share of that state’s overall Google search activity. Hover or tap a state to see its index and US rank.

Research implication: Baltimore is not sitting in a neutral rugby market. Maryland already over-indexes strongly for All Blacks search interest.

Source: DataForSEO Trends, 12-month US state-level relative-interest dataset. Figures are indexed, not absolute search volumes.

Maryland over time

How Maryland’s All Blacks search demand has moved since October 2025

The historical picture is more nuanced than a simple upward trend. Maryland’s estimated monthly All Blacks search volume has risen recently, but its share of total US demand has moved up and down as national interest changed.

Estimated monthly searches
720Oct
1,000Nov
590Dec
1,000Jan
720Feb
720Mar
720Apr
590May
880Jun
1,000Jul
1,300Aug
Share of measured US demand
Oct 20252.00%#16
Nov1.97%#14
Dec2.37%#12
Jan 20263.70%#5
Feb3.07%#8
Mar2.86%#9
Apr3.00%#9
May2.45%#12
Jun2.75%#10
Jul2.33%#12
Aug2.31%#12

Interpretation: Maryland’s absolute search volume reached its highest point in the current series in August 2026, while its share of total US demand was higher earlier in the year. That distinction matters: growth in raw searches does not necessarily mean Maryland is gaining share nationally.

Share of US search demand

California drives the most All Blacks searches — but Maryland punches above its size

Using DataForSEO’s state-level Google Ads search-volume estimates for the term “All Blacks”, Hyperset measured approximately 34,580 monthly searches across the 50 states. California contributes the largest share at 15.62%, followed by Texas at 8.39%, New York and Florida at 6.94% each. Maryland contributes 2.54% of measured US demand.

AK
AL
AR
AZ
CA
CO
CT
DE
FL
GA
HI
IA
ID
IL
IN
KS
KY
LA
MA
MD
ME
MI
MN
MO
MS
MT
NC
ND
NE
NH
NJ
NM
NV
NY
OH
OK
OR
PA
RI
SC
SD
TN
TX
UT
VA
VT
WA
WI
WV
WY
Important: these percentages are calculated from DataForSEO’s state-level Google Ads search-volume estimates and sum across the 50 states. They answer a different question from the relative-interest map above: this map shows where the searches come from; the earlier map shows where All Blacks interest is unusually concentrated relative to each state’s overall search activity.
CA
15.62%
TX
8.39%
NY
6.94%
FL
6.94%
IL
4.63%
GA
3.76%
MD
2.54%

Why this matters for the Baltimore story: the host state contributes a meaningful 2.54% of national All Blacks search volume while ranking third in the country for relative affinity. That combination is more interesting than either metric alone: Maryland is both a real source of demand and a disproportionately strong rugby-interest market.

What Hyperset can already see

The Baltimore event sits inside a measurable NFL search environment

Hyperset’s stored DataForSEO series for the Baltimore Ravens shows a clear change in US Google search interest around the Baltimore weekend. The index was 2 on 12 September, rose to 15 on 13 September, fell to 5 on 14 September, and reached 15 again on 20 September.

2
Sep 12
15
Sep 13
5
Sep 14
3
Sep 15
2
Sep 16
2
Sep 17
2
Sep 18
2
Sep 19
15
Sep 20
Important: this chart is context, not a causation claim. The Ravens were also operating inside the normal NFL season, so Hyperset would not attribute the increase to the rugby fixture without a New Zealand-market series and a proper baseline comparison.
The reverse crossover

The Ravens already hold a meaningful share of NFL team interest in New Zealand

Hyperset’s fresh DataForSEO New Zealand collection across all 32 NFL teams estimates roughly 50,010 monthly team-name searches in total. The Baltimore Ravens account for about 1,900 searches, or 3.80% of that measured team demand. That places Baltimore in a joint #9 position by current search volume, alongside the Detroit Lions, Los Angeles Rams, Miami Dolphins and Philadelphia Eagles.

Current NZ NFL team share
BUF
7.20%
GB
7.20%
KC
7.20%
NE
5.80%
SEA
5.80%
CHI
4.80%
DAL
4.80%
DEN
4.80%
BAL
3.80%
Method: each team’s DataForSEO Google Ads search-volume estimate in New Zealand divided by the sum of all 32 team estimates. Using share rather than raw volume gives a cleaner view of team attention inside the NFL market.

Baltimore’s share of NZ NFL team searches over time

The monthly series shows why share-normalisation matters. Ravens volume changes with the NFL calendar, but its share of all NFL team-name searches gives a cleaner signal. Baltimore’s share rose from 3.10% in June to 3.98% in July and was 3.70% in August, the latest complete month currently available.

3.18%
Oct 25
3.23%
Nov
3.71%
Dec
2.73%
Jan 26
2.57%
Feb
10.83%
Mar
5.23%
Apr
4.72%
May
3.10%
Jun
3.98%
Jul
3.70%
Aug
Timing caveat: DataForSEO’s monthly search-volume series currently runs through August 2026, so it does not yet capture the September Baltimore Test itself. The March spike is also notable and should be treated as a separate event/seasonal signal rather than evidence of the September crossover. The useful post-Baltimore test will be whether Baltimore’s NZ share moves materially once September and October monthly data become available.
New Zealand audience geography

Where do the Baltimore Ravens sit in New Zealand’s NFL search market?

Hyperset’s latest New Zealand search-demand analysis compares the Baltimore Ravens with all 31 other NFL teams. Rather than relying on raw volume alone, the analysis measures Baltimore’s share of total NFL team-name demand in New Zealand.

New Zealand NFL team share
BUF
7.20%
GB
7.20%
KC
7.20%
NE
5.80%
SEA
5.80%
CHI
4.80%
DAL
4.80%
DEN
4.80%
BAL
3.80%
How to read this: Baltimore’s share is calculated by dividing Ravens search demand by the combined measured demand for all 32 NFL team names in New Zealand. This helps separate team-level movement from league-wide seasonality.

Why this matters: the Ravens already have a measurable audience position in New Zealand before Hyperset attempts to attribute any effect to the Baltimore–All Blacks relationship. That gives the partnership a useful baseline: future movement can be measured against an existing level of NFL team interest rather than starting from zero.

Source: Hyperset analysis of DataForSEO Google Ads search-volume data for all 32 NFL teams in New Zealand. The current monthly dataset runs through August 2026; later months will be added when released.

The study Hyperset proposes

Measure the crossover in both directions

1. Is US interest in the All Blacks rising?

Track US search demand for All Blacks and New Zealand rugby terms over time, then compare pre-Baltimore, event-week and post-event periods.

2. Did Maryland over-index?

Compare Maryland with the US average and other host/sports markets to test whether the Baltimore fixture produced a distinct local audience effect.

3. Is NFL interest growing in New Zealand?

Measure league-level NFL search demand in New Zealand and compare it with the same period in 2025 to control for normal seasonality.

4. Are the Ravens gaining share in New Zealand?

Compare Baltimore against all 32 NFL teams so any Ravens uplift is measured as share of NFL attention, not just raw seasonal growth.

Methodology

Built to separate genuine audience movement from event noise

Search demand

DataForSEO search-volume and Google Trends datasets, using market-specific and time-series views where available.

Share, not just volume

For NFL team comparisons, team demand should be divided by total NFL team demand in the same market and month. That controls for league-wide seasonal surges.

Independent validation

Official NZR and Ravens publishing, Google Search Console and dated event milestones are used to validate timing and context. Correlation is not presented as causation.

Current research status: Hyperset already holds the Ravens US series and live Search Console evidence shown above. A dedicated New Zealand market series for the NFL/Ravens and a dedicated US series for All Blacks/NZR are the next collection layer. Until those are complete, this preview deliberately avoids claiming that either organisation has already grown because of the partnership.

What this proof of concept demonstrates

A live audience-intelligence module, not a static article

1 · Collect

Hyperset gathers the audience signals

Search volume, Google Trends-style relative interest, geography, team share and publisher performance can be refreshed on a defined cadence rather than researched once and left to age.

2 · Normalise

Category seasonality is separated from team movement

Where possible Hyperset compares a team’s share of total category demand, rather than treating a league-wide seasonal rise as evidence that one organisation has grown.

3 · Publish

The same verified dataset can power partner websites

NZR or the Ravens could publish selected maps, rankings and trend modules on their own sites while Hyperset remains the independent source and calculation layer behind them.

4 · Update

New observations can replace old ones automatically

The weekly crossover pulse on this page is the prototype: as fresh observations arrive, the module can update without the partner rebuilding the article or chart manually.

Proof-of-concept status: the live workflow is already operating on this Hyperset page. A partner implementation would use the same principle but expose an agreed subset of metrics through a managed feed, API or embeddable module, with methodology and freshness displayed alongside the data.
For New Zealand Rugby
The proposition is simple: Hyperset can provide the live, impartial audience-data layer behind this story.

NZR already has the story, the people and the Baltimore connection. Hyperset can turn that into a defensible audience study, publish the neutral research hub, and supply a complete NZR-facing article focused on what the US data means for the All Blacks. A corresponding Ravens-facing version can then use the same underlying research to tell the New Zealand side of the story.

Potential NZR headline: “What Baltimore tells us about the All Blacks’ growing American audience”
Potential Ravens headline: “How the All Blacks are introducing Baltimore to a new audience in New Zealand”